2024-01-10 09:42:42

Blogger sued Zhang Xuefeng: Internet celebrities c

I put the screenshot of the reasons for the prosecution of the emerging writer. You can take a look at it and judge how ridiculous the reason for the writer's prosecution.

Blogger sued Zhang Xuefeng: Internet celebrities confrontation, who is better than the law in front of the law?

Blogger sued Zhang Xuefeng: Internet celebrities confrontation, who is better than the law in front of the law?

The writer sued Zhang Xuefeng, how big is the winning face?

A media reporter in Henan interviewed a lawyer. The lawyer said that the writer's prosecution was very low. One is whether the individual of the writer can represent the whole of liberal arts students. It is difficult to recommend a recommendation procedure. Content, scope, etc., related proof is difficult. It is believed that the emerging writer also consulted a lawyer before suing and knew that he was not winning.

Why do you know that the winning face is not big, the writer still sued Zhang Xuefeng?

After the writer issued a notice of filed a case, Zhang Xuefeng suspected that he also issued a reply, thinking that it was not necessary to sue himself. But writers think it is necessary.

Blogger sued Zhang Xuefeng: Internet celebrities confrontation, who is better than the law in front of the law?

Looking at Zhang Xuefeng's reply carefully. Although it is cut, Zhang Xuefeng looks like a mirror in his heart: The indicting person is already miserable, and he must sue Zhang Xuefeng to attract (everyone) attention. The writer is for traffic, for its name. So regardless of the winning or losing, everyone knows this emerging writer through this lawsuit, and he has won!

In short, the Education Expo advocated that Xuefeng caused controversy due to his speech and was sued by the media author, the emerging writer, and the poet. The case triggered the public's thinking on freedom of speech. Regardless of the results, we remind us that we respect others' views, avoid aggressive words, and realize that freedom of speech must be responsible. (Editor in charge: Liang Yunjiao CN079)